Several different humidity measures exist and they answer different questions.
Relative humidity
Moisture as a percentage of what the air could hold at that temperature.
Which changes as temperature changes with no moisture added or removed.
Dew point
The temperature at which condensation would occur.
Which is an absolute measure of moisture content.
Why dew point is more useful
Directly indicating how humid conditions feel.
Fog formation
Temperature falling to dew point.
Which is why the gap between them is watched.
Why relative humidity misleads
The same air can be ninety percent relative humidity at dawn and forty percent by afternoon with no moisture added or removed, simply because it warmed.
Which makes the number a poor guide to how humid conditions actually feel.
Dew point does not have this problem: a dew point in the low teens is comfortable and one in the mid twenties is oppressive, regardless of the temperature.
Heat index calculation
Combining temperature and humidity into a felt temperature.
Which is what heat warnings use.
Indoor humidity
Affecting comfort, condensation and health.
Which has a recommended range.
Condensation
Surfaces below dew point collecting water.
Reading forecasts
Dew point as the more informative figure.
Why understanding the system matters
Weather warnings are the output of a large, expensive, internationally coordinated system that most people interact with only through an app icon. It is one of the clearest examples anywhere of publicly funded science producing something almost everyone uses daily without noticing it exists.
The practical value of understanding it lies in reading warnings correctly. A hurricane cone is not a map of the storm, a watch is not a warning, a hundred-year flood is not once a century, and a radar app is not a warning service. Each of those misunderstandings has cost lives, and each is corrected in a single sentence.
How the warning system is actually organised
National meteorological services observe, model and forecast; they issue watches, warnings and advisories against defined criteria; and local emergency management agencies decide what action follows, including evacuations, shelter openings and road closures.
Those are two organisations with two different jobs, which is why a national forecast office issues a warning and a county decides who evacuates. Knowing which to follow for which question removes a great deal of confusion during an event.
What is worth doing before a season starts
Find out which hazards actually affect where you live, check whether your address sits in a flood or surge zone, identify where you would shelter, confirm that emergency alerts are enabled on your phone, and know how you would get information if the power and the network both failed.
None of that takes long, all of it is free, and every element becomes considerably harder to arrange once a warning has been issued. Emergency managers say the same thing after every major event: the households that coped were the ones who had decided in advance.
Where the authoritative information is
National meteorological services issue the warnings, publish the forecasts, explain what each product means and archive the underlying data, all freely. Local emergency management agencies publish evacuation zones, shelter locations and preparedness guidance specific to where you live.
Between them those two sources answer almost every question anyone has about weather risk, and both are considerably more reliable than aggregated coverage, which routinely reproduces the misunderstandings that cause harm.
A general note
Warning terminology, alert thresholds and emergency procedures differ between countries and between agencies, and are revised as understanding improves. Anything with safety consequences should be checked against the service responsible for the area you are in.
The pattern behind all of this
Almost every topic here comes down to the same three things: an atmosphere that behaves according to physics we can model imperfectly, an observation network that tells us where it currently is, and a communication problem that determines whether any of that reaches the person who needs it in time.
The physics has improved steadily. The observation network is extraordinary and largely invisible. The communication problem is the one that keeps producing casualties, because a technically excellent warning that is misread, arrives on a silenced phone, or is disregarded because the last three were false alarms has achieved nothing.
That is why so much of what meteorological agencies do now is about wording, graphics, delivery channels and public understanding rather than about the science. The science is in reasonable shape; getting people to act on it is the harder half of the job.
What to take away
Know which hazards apply where you live, know what the alert words mean, have more than one way of receiving warnings, and decide what you would do before you need to decide it.
Those four things are free, take an afternoon, and are what every emergency manager wishes more households had done.